Wednesday, October 5, 2022
Home POLITICS Opinion | No preparation for the big one

Opinion | No preparation for the big one

Covid-19 may have been the biggest global health crisis in a century, but in many ways it could have been worse, much worse. Despite the scale and suffering, with the pandemic still unfinished and at least 15 million people dead, nearly 600 million people infected (possibly more than the Spanish flu), and costing the global economy at least $11 Billions and counting, I still got lucky. Had the virus been more transmissible, more virulent, or more lethal, the state of the world today would likely be even bleaker. With the risk of another pandemic occurring with the same kind of impact as Covid-19 increasing by 2 percent each year, that threat still hangs over us. So are we ready for the next Big One?

To be frank: no.

As with all “Public Health Emergencies of International Concern” thus far, except for the Zika virus, the global Covid response has focused on our best defense: vaccines. And with vaccination, the biggest impact during a pandemic lies in first protecting high-risk groups (those most likely to come into contact with a virus and the most vulnerable) and then increasing coverage to slow the spread of the disease. illness. However, the current plan being drawn up by G-20 leaders for how we should prepare for and respond to future pandemics does not set out how the world’s poorest countries would have access to vaccines in the next health emergency, nor how high a risk. Groups would be prioritized.

For more than two decades, my organization, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, has been on a mission to protect the world’s poorest and most vulnerable children, vaccinating more than a billion additional children so far, and each year providing vaccines for more than half the world’s children. This has led to a 70 percent reduction in deaths from vaccine-preventable diseases. We also support stockpiles of epidemic vaccines. So when Covid-19 hit, we knew that billions of people could miss out on immunization unless immediate action was taken. That is why we help create COVAX.

During the Covid pandemic, COVAX was the only initiative that had global equitable access for high-risk groups as its main operational focus; for hundreds of millions of people most at risk in the poorest countries, this has been the only source of covid vaccines. Despite facing immense barriers every step of the way, COVAX is the main reason why 75 percent of health workers and 63 percent of older people in low-income countries are now fully protected, by the same as on average 50 percent of their populations. So if we want to have a chance of being prepared for the next pandemic, then it makes sense to have something like COVAX already in place and funded in advance, particularly before the Big One hits, to ensure that next time the response is quicker. and more effective. However, there are currently no plans for this.

It is true that global governance and financing frameworks are being developed to ensure that countries are better prepared for the next pandemic. But there must also be an operational response on hold, particularly when it comes to vaccines.

With infectious diseases, no one is safe until everyone is safe, so the role COVAX has played in ensuring that people everywhere have access to vaccines has undoubtedly been important. Given that it has delivered 1.7 billion doses and is responsible for 76 percent of the covid vaccines received by low-income countries, this begs the question of how people in these countries will access vaccines next time, to unless there is something like COVAX to secure and deliver billions of doses of vaccines?

This does not mean that we should create a new organization or institution for the pandemic. In fact, the reality is that no organization has all the knowledge, resources, or infrastructure to achieve this end-to-end approach. The only reason COVAX has been so successful is because it is based on a network approach that was able to build on the strengths of global health organizations that already existed. From its main partners, the Coalition for Innovations in Epidemic Preparedness, Gavi, the World Health Organization and UNICEF, to civil society organizations, the private sector and ministries of health, each partner turned when the crisis hit to allow COVAX as a whole to respond quickly, adapting and innovating when necessary.

All of this is necessary because carrying out vaccine launches on the scale we have seen with Covid, the largest and most complex global rollout in history, involves much more than just delivering vaccines. It also involves accelerating vaccine development, scaling up manufacturing so higher volumes can be produced, securing doses, negotiating lower prices, and putting in place all the logistical pieces needed to deliver vaccines, including the supply chain, cold storage, data systems, surveillance networks, and trained health workers, as well as all the important legal safety nets of indemnity, liability, and compensation.

As daunting as it sounds, the point is that we now know it’s possible, and ultimately we need to improve it. Because despite all that it has achieved, COVAX could have done better. Faced with vaccine hoarding, export restrictions and a lack of transparency from manufacturers, COVAX experienced severe supply constraints last year that caused delays. If COVAX had existed before the pandemic, rather than being created on the fly, and if contingency funds had already been at risk rather than having to be raised in the midst of a global crisis, then it could have responded faster, safer deals. with manufacturers before and shipped higher dose volumes to people faster.

We do not know what form the next pandemic will take, or whether it will be possible to develop vaccines against it. But what we do know at least is that if we don’t implement all of this now, the response will be slower and less effective. And if the next one is another Big One, it could come at a terrifying and devastating cost.

RELATED ARTICLES

Progressive See extremism only elsewhere

The 9/11 elections in Sweden shocked intellectuals across the West. The Sweden Democrats, a nationalist-populist party founded in 1988 with neo-Nazi loyalties but...

Dr. Oz Closes in on Fetterman in Pennsylvania Senate Race: POLL

Republican candidate Dr. Mehmet Oz is narrowing the Democratic lieutenant's lead in the polls. government John Fetterman in the Pennsylvania Senate race, according...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Progressive See extremism only elsewhere

The 9/11 elections in Sweden shocked intellectuals across the West. The Sweden Democrats, a nationalist-populist party founded in 1988 with neo-Nazi loyalties but...

Dr. Oz Closes in on Fetterman in Pennsylvania Senate Race: POLL

Republican candidate Dr. Mehmet Oz is narrowing the Democratic lieutenant's lead in the polls. government John Fetterman in the Pennsylvania Senate race, according...

In a new book, Nikki Haley criticizes the ‘hypocrisy’ of modern feminism

"Women fought for so long to have the freedom to make their own decisions," but now, every thought in their lives is "boxed in...